Membership
Total Users
- 40076 registered
- 24 today
- 278 this week
- 5149 this month
- Last: kwoienxn
Details for Morality, Benevolence, and Responsibility: Regime Legitimacy in China from Past to the Present
-
Morality, Benevolence, and Responsibility: Regime Legitimacy in China from Past to the Present
- Date Added:
- 11/07/2011
- Name:
- Morality, Benevolence, and Responsibility: Regime Legitimacy in China from Past to the Present
- Filename:
- soc (286).pdf
- Filesize:
- 356.34 kB
- Filetype:
- pdf (Mime Type: application/pdf)
- Created On:
- 11/07/2011 16:42
- Viewers:
- Everybody
- Maintained By:
- Publisher
- Hits:
- 0 Hits
- Updated On:
- 11/07/2011 16:43
- Hits:
- 0
Taking an interpretive approach, this study argues that Chinese political tradition plays an important role in the maintenance of regime legitimacy in China today. Contrary to the popular view that the Chinese Communist regime relies primarily on economic performance to sustain its legitimacy, the current regime legitimacy is maintained because of the historically rooted moral bond between the state and society and the societal expectation that the state would be responsible for the wellbeing of the population. The regime legitimacy in China has three overlapping layers: The basic layer is the morality of political elite. The crucial part of the morality is the benevolent governance which specifies that the government has to be compassionate to the people. The central component of a benevolent government is the state responsibility to the welfare of the people. All together, these layers create a moral bond between the state and society. The government will enjoy legitimacy as far as the society expects it to fulfill its end of the deal. This study further argues that the morality-based regime legitimacy in China has to be calibrated within its multi-level power structure. Governments at different levels enjoy different degree of legitimacy and face different degree of challenges. In general, the central government enjoys the most legitimacy and faces the least challenges comparing to the local governments. This multi-level power structure would cushion many regime legitimacy crises.
